As we now know from the Climategate Emails, this band [of Climategate scientists] saw the Medieval Warm Period as an enormous obstacle in their mission of spreading the word about global warming. If temperatures were warmer 1,000 years ago than today, the Climategate Emails explain in detail, their message that we now live in the warmest of all possible times would be undermined…With the help of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the highest climate change authority of all, they published what became the icon of their movement — the hockey stick graph. This icon showed temperatures in the last 1,000 years to have been stable — no Medieval Warm Period, not even the Little Ice Age of a few centuries ago.But the UN’s official verdict that the Medieval Warm Period had not existed did not erase the countless schoolbooks, encyclopedias, and other scholarly sources that claimed it had. Rewriting those would take decades, time that the band members didn’t have if they were to save the globe from warming.Instead, the band members turned to their friends in the media and to the blogosphere, creating a website called RealClimate.org. “The idea is that we working climate scientists should have a place where we can mount a rapid response to supposedly ‘bombshell’ papers that are doing the rounds” in aid of “combating dis-information,” one email explained… One person in the nine-member Realclimate.org team — U.K. scientist and Green Party activist William Connolley — would take on particularly crucial duties.Connolley took control of all things climate in the most used information source the world has ever known – Wikipedia. Starting in February 2003, ... Connolley set to work on the Wikipedia site. He rewrote Wikipedia’s articles on global warming, on the greenhouse effect, on the instrumental temperature record, on the urban heat island, on climate models, on global cooling. On Feb. 14, he began to erase the Little Ice Age; on Aug.11, the Medieval Warm Period. In October, he turned his attention to the hockey stick graph. He rewrote articles on the politics of global warming and on the scientists who were skeptical of the band. Richard Lindzen and Fred Singer, two of the world’s most distinguished climate scientists, were among his early targets, followed by others that the band especially hated, such as Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, authorities on the Medieval Warm Period.All told, Connolley created or rewrote 5,428 unique Wikipedia articles. His control over Wikipedia was greater still, however, through the role he obtained at Wikipedia as a website administrator, which allowed him to act with virtual impunity. When Connolley didn’t like the subject of a certain article, he removed it — more than 500 articles of various descriptions disappeared at his hand. When he disapproved of the arguments that others were making, he often had them barred — over 2,000 Wikipedia contributors who ran afoul of him found themselves blocked from making further contributions… In these ways, Connolley turned Wikipedia into the missionary wing of the global warming movement.
Saturday, December 19, 2009
#Climategate: how the cabal controlled Wikipedia
Lawrence Soloman on how the Climategate scientists hijacked Wikipedia to preach warming and censor sceptics:
This scandal grows more astonishing by the day - in its extent, its effect, its shamelessness, its savage intolerance and its betrayal of science. But this aspect of Climategate also sounds a deep warning of how easily the new technology of information dissemination can be hijacked by only a few well-placed extremists. Add that to Google’s promotion of Al Gore last week on its home page, and you can see and fear the potential.
NBC/WSJ poll: 57% say the Iraq war has been successful
POLL: Iraq War A Success: “Here’s a final set of numbers from our new NBC/WSJ poll that we find fascinating: 57% say the Iraq war has been successful, versus 40% who say it has been unsuccessful. It’s a reversal from July 2008, when 43% said Iraq was successful, and 53% said it was unsuccessful.” Yeah, but that was when there was a lot of election-related propaganda. Now that’s dissipated, being no longer useful. From the Instapundit |
Fancy that - the Great Barrier Reef is in "bloody brilliant shape"
As Ben Cropp noted a couple of years ago - he's noticed no change in the Reef in 50 years of diving there. When well meaning people who do care for the environment realise just to what extent they have been lied to by environmentalists and activist scientists, there is going to be hell to be paid. But as someone who feels passionately that true science is the answer to our problems and the guarantor of our future, I am angry and dismayed at the likely consequences for the standing and reputation of science as it becomes more commonly known that whether it be about the Reef or climate change generally, large parts of the scientific establishment have deliberately exaggerated and distorted their findings to fit within a predetermined narrative of impending doom and progressive degradation. Again, as always, this isn't to say that there are not challenges facing us in caring for the natural world. There are. And yes, we do face challenges from a climate that is doing what it has always done: change. The following reports from today's press highlight yet again another crucial point. Nature is not fragile. The idea that it is would have to be one of the most spectacularly stupid ones ever to come out the deracinated inner-city hippies who make up the core of support for the Greens and company. Life hasn't survived for over 3 billion years, facing in that time cataclysms and calamities almost beyond our imagining, by being fragile. It is tenacious and adaptable. It hangs on, and it surprises us again and again. Here's a report from this morning's The Australian:
Elsewhere in the same issue:
Andrew Bolt points the finger at one of the most notorious alarmists:
|
Yes, these are the people shaping your future
From The Age:
Tim Blair has more:
“Copenhagen will mark a shift of tectonic proportions in political thinking around climate change internationally and in Australia,” claims Marian Wilkinson. She could well be right. But just when you think Marian’s finally wising up, it turns out she means the debate will shift towards warmenism. Here’s her next sentence:
Their argument was unconvincing at first, until people noticed the persuasively bulbous green antennae.
When you’re dressed as a tree and you happen upon someone else dressed as a tree, the appropriate protocol is to high-branch him.
This shot is from a Copenhagen rally in sunny Sydney, where unpopular activist Darryl was asked to wear the poley bear outfit. They’ve never liked Darryl, but that’s no reason to kill him.
Armed climate clowns – note the unconcealed vegetation – pursue a Copenhagen cop. But circumstances can quickly change …
A lone clown finds herself cut from the herd and exposed to both the elements and nearby lawmen. Subsequent images from this series are deleted.
“I tawt I taw a climate graph!” Sylvester the Scientist analyses the latest CRU data.
Yvo de Boer and his enormous clock.
Scepticism about the science is now pushed further to the fringe.
Which isn’t such a bad a place to be, considering where the climate change non-fringe is – generally wearing a costume, unemployable, shouting historic commie slogans and being an idiot:
If capitalism does indeed kill climate justice, then all strength to capitalism, I say.
If capitalism does indeed kill climate justice, then all strength to capitalism, I say.
Their argument was unconvincing at first, until people noticed the persuasively bulbous green antennae.
When you’re dressed as a tree and you happen upon someone else dressed as a tree, the appropriate protocol is to high-branch him.
This shot is from a Copenhagen rally in sunny Sydney, where unpopular activist Darryl was asked to wear the poley bear outfit. They’ve never liked Darryl, but that’s no reason to kill him.
Armed climate clowns – note the unconcealed vegetation – pursue a Copenhagen cop. But circumstances can quickly change …
A lone clown finds herself cut from the herd and exposed to both the elements and nearby lawmen. Subsequent images from this series are deleted.
“I tawt I taw a climate graph!” Sylvester the Scientist analyses the latest CRU data.
Yvo de Boer and his enormous clock.Reassuring, no?
Tony Abbott preaches all children must read the Bible
No, that title is not mine. It's the headline chosen by someone at the Courier Mail. Sigh. I do sometimes wonder about how some of these idiots get their jobs and how they managed to, apparently, finish a university degree. No, Abbott isn't saying this at all (though you can guarantee this will be repeated as a statement of fact by the Cultural Left from now on). He's saying no more than what a Marxist professor of English from Adelaide University said some years ago - you cannot be a culturally literate member of Western civilisation without some knowledge of the Bible and Christianity. Up until quite recently, our art and literature were shot through with Biblical and Christian allusions, and it is impossible to understand these (or indeed the history of our civilisation) without some appreciation of them. And this is not about whether you 'believe' or not.
The media framing of Abbott as some kind of dangerous religious extremist has begun. I don't see any actual quote from Abbott in the article saying that 'Bible classes' should be 'compulsory'.But while they are so sure of their own virtue in relation to Abbott's "prejudices," they seemingly are blind to their own. How else to explain the decision of that ridiculous buffoon Laurie Oakes to think he was being clever asking Abbott if he believed in evolution. What? For Christ's sake Laurie, he's a Roman Catholic, not some evangelical or charismatic. The Church of Rome effectively made its peace with Darwin many years ago. So what was being showcased during that interview was Oakes' own appalling ignorance and his own prejudice on display. |
Friday, December 18, 2009
The Best Science Fiction and Fantasy of the Year: Volume 4
My friend and colleague Jonathan Strahan has a new anthology out. "With the manuscript safely in the hands of the publisher in San Francisco, I can now reveal the final table of contents for The Best Science Fiction & Fantasy of the Year: Volume 4. As anthologists always do, I wish I’d had more space to include other stories that I loved, but I think that these selections are very strong." Check out the table of contents and other details here. |
Thursday, December 17, 2009
20 tips to save the planet - like, reuse your toilet wipes & poison Chinese workers
YOU'LL have freaked at all the reports warning that if we don't cut our gases, our cities will drown, our farms will turn to dust and giant hurricanes will suck up every last polar bear. But don't despair. I've scoured the papers to find this year's 20 top tips to cut your gases and help save this planet from global warming catastrophe. And, swear to God, every one of these news items is genuine. The list is here http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/column_20_tips_to_save_the_planet/
Spam:Copehagen circus ending with a lame act
That's right. Hot air, no fixed targets, promises of a vast transfer of wealth from the West and everyone flies back home thinking they've been warriors for mankind. Full post here following the announcement of a "breakthrough" at Copenhagen http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/copehagen_circus_ending_with_a_lame_act/
"Don't tell my boss, but two-thirds of the delegates here are mad"
A reprise from the Bali climate change conference: Outside the conference hall, I went up to a fragrant Japanese lady manning one of the exhibits set up by the ever-growing number of taxpayer-funded quangos... She drew me to one side and whispered, "Don't tell my boss, but two-thirds of the delegates here are mad." Full post here http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/diary_of_a_heathen_in_bali/ Given the freak show that Copenhagen became, things haven't improved!
#Climategate: This time Al Gore lied
Al Gore's claim that the Climategate emails were insignificant relied on two defences. Both are so flagrantly wrong that it's not enough to say Gore is simply mistaken. No, Al Gore is a liar. A shameless and reckless liar.
Read all about it here http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/climategate_this_time_al_gore_lied/
Read all about it here http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/climategate_this_time_al_gore_lied/
Spam:The health freaks are now gunning for Santa
From the Food & Health Skeptic, reproducing an article that appeared in the press yesterday:
One wonders if this is entirely serious. Anybody who talks of "giant multinational capitalists" is probably cross-eyed with hate, however SANTA Claus has been accused of acting in ways that could "damage millions of lives". As the mythical man in red zooms around the planet delivering gifts, he is an unwitting promoter of obesity, unhealthy products, disease and even drink driving, according to an Australian academic. "Other dangerous activities that Santa could be accused of promoting include speeding, disregard for road rules and extreme sports such as roof surfing and chimney jumping," said Dr Nathan Grills, public health fellow at Monash University's Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine. "Despite the risks of high speed air travel, Santa is never depicted wearing a seatbelt or helmet." In a paper published by the British Medical Journal, Dr Grills said Santa Claus' contemporary image became cemented in the public consciousness through a series of Coca Cola advertisements that began in the 1930s. His image was subsequently used in tobacco advertising and, while most countries had moved to ban this, it was common to still see Santa pictured on Christmas cards with a pipe in hand. A study found Santa Claus was the only fictional character that was more highly recognised by US children than Ronald McDonald. "If Ronald McDonald can be so effective at selling burgers to children, we might expect Santa to be equally effective at selling other goods," Dr Grills said. "... Public health needs to be aware of what giant multinational capitalists realised long ago, that Santa sells and sometimes he sells harmful products." Dr Grills said countries like India were increasingly celebrating Christmas, and Santa's image could again be used to sell harmful products where there was less regulation of advertising. Santa's "rotund sedentary image" also had the effect of making "obesity synonymous with cheerfulness and joviality" around the world, he said. Children were also encouraged to leave out brandy, or other hard liquor, for a man who had to do a lot of travel and visit a lot of houses all in one night. Amid a global swine flu pandemic, Dr Grills said most people who stood in as Santa impersonators were not required to undergo a health check - and they get "kissed and hugged" by a succession of "snotty-nosed kids". "We need to be aware that Santa has an ability to influence people, and especially children, towards unhealthy behaviour," he said. "Given Santa's universal appeal, and reasoning from a public health perspective, Santa needs to affect health by only 0.1 per cent to damage millions of lives." Instead using a sleigh, Santa should be "encouraged to adopt a more active method to deliver toys - swapping his reindeer for a bike or simply walking or jogging", Dr Grills said.
http://john-ray.blogspot.com/2009/12/health-freaks-are-now-gunning-for-santa.html Though, this has got to be a joke, right? No real academic speaking seriously could be so stupid, could they? I mean, otherwise, you'd be forced to think that this was personal opinion and prejudice dressed up as research wouldn't you? Because, really, what evidence is produced to back up any of Dr Grill's glib assertions? Nah, has to be an end of year prank. Surely? Tell you what though, if it isn't, then our universities are clearly not under-funded. Not if they've got money to waste on this kind of pseudo-academic rubbish.
One wonders if this is entirely serious. Anybody who talks of "giant multinational capitalists" is probably cross-eyed with hate, however SANTA Claus has been accused of acting in ways that could "damage millions of lives". As the mythical man in red zooms around the planet delivering gifts, he is an unwitting promoter of obesity, unhealthy products, disease and even drink driving, according to an Australian academic. "Other dangerous activities that Santa could be accused of promoting include speeding, disregard for road rules and extreme sports such as roof surfing and chimney jumping," said Dr Nathan Grills, public health fellow at Monash University's Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine. "Despite the risks of high speed air travel, Santa is never depicted wearing a seatbelt or helmet." In a paper published by the British Medical Journal, Dr Grills said Santa Claus' contemporary image became cemented in the public consciousness through a series of Coca Cola advertisements that began in the 1930s. His image was subsequently used in tobacco advertising and, while most countries had moved to ban this, it was common to still see Santa pictured on Christmas cards with a pipe in hand. A study found Santa Claus was the only fictional character that was more highly recognised by US children than Ronald McDonald. "If Ronald McDonald can be so effective at selling burgers to children, we might expect Santa to be equally effective at selling other goods," Dr Grills said. "... Public health needs to be aware of what giant multinational capitalists realised long ago, that Santa sells and sometimes he sells harmful products." Dr Grills said countries like India were increasingly celebrating Christmas, and Santa's image could again be used to sell harmful products where there was less regulation of advertising. Santa's "rotund sedentary image" also had the effect of making "obesity synonymous with cheerfulness and joviality" around the world, he said. Children were also encouraged to leave out brandy, or other hard liquor, for a man who had to do a lot of travel and visit a lot of houses all in one night. Amid a global swine flu pandemic, Dr Grills said most people who stood in as Santa impersonators were not required to undergo a health check - and they get "kissed and hugged" by a succession of "snotty-nosed kids". "We need to be aware that Santa has an ability to influence people, and especially children, towards unhealthy behaviour," he said. "Given Santa's universal appeal, and reasoning from a public health perspective, Santa needs to affect health by only 0.1 per cent to damage millions of lives." Instead using a sleigh, Santa should be "encouraged to adopt a more active method to deliver toys - swapping his reindeer for a bike or simply walking or jogging", Dr Grills said.
http://john-ray.blogspot.com/2009/12/health-freaks-are-now-gunning-for-santa.html Though, this has got to be a joke, right? No real academic speaking seriously could be so stupid, could they? I mean, otherwise, you'd be forced to think that this was personal opinion and prejudice dressed up as research wouldn't you? Because, really, what evidence is produced to back up any of Dr Grill's glib assertions? Nah, has to be an end of year prank. Surely? Tell you what though, if it isn't, then our universities are clearly not under-funded. Not if they've got money to waste on this kind of pseudo-academic rubbish.
Wednesday, December 16, 2009
A party particular Christmas greeting
|
Daily Express - 100 Reasons Why Global Warming is Natural
![]() The tide has turned. The Daily Express’s 100 reasons here. Some or all of these could be wrong but, as Andrew says, at least we are finally getting to have the debate that the eco-fascists from Greenpeace or the WWF tried to prevent ever taking place. |
"My speciality is the epidemiology of mosquito-borne diseases"
Also from the Bolter: Paul Reiter, one of the world’s greatest experts on mosquitos, nails Al Gore on yet another deceit:
Reiter also gives yet more evidence at the corruption of the scientific process that is at the heart of the IPCC. UPDATE Yet another Gore whoopsie, this time on extra “tree motality” thanks to global warming. At what stage can we call this fraud a bare-faced liar? It’s odd that not one of his many, many mistakes errs on the side of calm. |
Young Sudanese refugee's Aussie Rules football dream
From Andrew Bolt:
It’s easy to mock Australia’s obsession with sport as a triumph of brawn over brains. But hear Sudanese-born Majak Daw - a most impressive young man - talk of being selected by North Melbourne. The accent, the choice of our national game, the modesty, the intelligence - and all shown on the great stage of Australian football.
Australian Rules in particular is not a mere sport. It is a social glue. Daw’s example will draw many Sudanese into one of the great Australian traditions, and will reassure many other Australians that Sudanese such as Daw do indeed wish to be of us, and not just next to us.
"PHIL JONES??? HAS ANYONE SEEN PHIL JONES???"
Reason‘s Ron Bailey reports from Copendorken:
Driven from its traditional feeding areas by unprecedented polar melting, the beast’s foraging infuriated delegates:
(Via Nicole, who writes: “I want this on a postcard.") From Tim Blair |
New Scientist becomes the NonScientist
News on the new Non Scientist – Updated: now with bullying15 12 2009Jo Nova has launched a new publication, inspired today by their latest article. Read on. ![]() You might think journalists at a popular science magazine would be able to investigate and reason. In DenierGate, watch New Scientist closely, as they do the unthinkable and try to defend gross scientific malpractice by saying it’s OK because other people did other things a little bit wrong, that were not related, and a long time ago. Move along ladies and gentlemen, there’s nothing to see… The big problem for this formerly good publication is that they have decided already what the answer is to any question on climate-change (and the answer could be warm or cold but it’s always ALARMING). That leaves them clutching for sand-bags to prop up their position as the king-tide sweeps away any journalistic credibility they might have had. I’ve added my own helpful notes into the New Scientist article, just so you get the full picture. Read the whole story at Jo Nova’s website, and tell her I sent you. UPDATE: More bullying from scientists
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


