Follow Watts Up With That? on Twitter

http://twitter.com/wattsupwiththat Anthony Watts is a meteorologist of a sceptical bent when it comes to climate change, but who is also thoughtful and open minded when it comes to questions of evidence and what it means and how far you can run with it. Well worth your attention.

Posted via email from Garth's posterous

Suggestions of “strong negative cloud feedbacks” in a warmer climate

Plus, a really cool photo, taken from the International Space Station!

 

Natural heat engine - the cumulonimbus cloud, transports heat from the lower to upper levels of the atmosphere. Source International Space Station NASA - click for large image

 

I thought this post on clouds and climate modeling below from Steve McIntyre’s Climate Audit was interesting, because it highlights the dreaded “negative feedbacks” that many climate modelers say don’t exist. Dr. Richard Lindzen highlighted the importance of negative feedback in a recent WUWT post.

 

One of the comments to the CA article shows the simplicity and obviousness of the existence of negative feedback in one of our most common weather events. Willis Eschenbach writes:

Cloud positive feedback is one of the most foolish and anti-common sense claims of the models.

 

This is particularly true of cumulus and cumulonimbus, which increase with the temperature during the day, move huge amounts of energy from the surface aloft, reflect huge amounts of energy to space, and fade away and disappear at night.

Spot on Willis, I couldn’t agree more. This is especially well demonstrated in the Inter Tropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) The ITCZ has been in the news recently because early analysis of the flight path of Air France 447 suggests flying through an intense thunderstorm cell in the ITCZ may have been the fatal mistake. There is a huge amount of energy being transported into the upper atmosphere by these storms.

 

Full post at Watts Up With That?

 

Posted via email from Garth's posterous