Showing posts with label the sun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the sun. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

More evidence the Sun drives climate change


image
Correlation recently reported between solar/GCR [galactic cosmic rays] variability and temperature in Siberia from glacial ice core, 30 yr lag (ie. ocean currents may be part of response)

Man may be innocent, after all. Jasper Kirkby of CERN [The European Organization for Nuclear Research (French: Organisation Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire)] explains new research into whether solar activity has caused cosmic rays to indirectly warm the earth:
This talk presents an overview of the palaeoclimatic evidence for solar/cosmic ray forcing of the climate, and reviews the possible physical mechanisms. These will be investigated in the CLOUD experiment which begins to take data at the CERN PS later this year.
UPDATE
A new paper in the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics also fingers the sun:
In concluding, we find increasingly strong evidence of a clear solar signature in a number of climatic indicators in Europe, strengthening the earlier conclusions of a study that included stations from the United States (Le Mouël et al., 2008 ). With the recent downturn of both solar activity and global temperatures, the debated correlations we suggested in Le Mouël et al. (2005), which appeared to stop in the 1980s, actually might extend to the present. The role of the Sun in global and regional climate change should be re-assessed and reasonable physical mechanisms are in sight.
(Via Benny Peiser.)
 
 
As Jeff Jacoby of The Boston Globe asks No climate debate? Yes, there is
 

Posted via email from Garth's posterous

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Our Current Minimum is More Maunder than Dalton


 
 
This is a plot of three year windows on the Maunder and Dalton Minimum and the current minimum:
 
Maunder-Dalton1
 
What it is showing is how the start of the current minimum compares with the starts of the Maunder and Dalton Minima.  The solar cycle minimum at the start of the Dalton was a lot more active than the current one.  If you consider that very small spots are being counted now, the activities are very similar.  This is how they look without the Dalton:
 
Maunder-Dalton2
 
If you consider the [current sunspot] counting problem, they are actually a pretty good match.
 
David Archibald
 

Posted via email from Garth's posterous