Instead of running that image of Ursus bogus, why didn’t Science magazine choose this shot instead? It’s by the same artist, and is far more heart-wrenching on account of the tragically immobile wind turbine. (Via Shub Niggurath.) Meanwhile, the original photoshopped poley is causing grief for warmenist Peter Gleick, as Bradley Fikes reports:
Warmies are always sensitive to the pointing out of mistakes. So would you be too, if your worldview was based on them. Speaking of worlds, please enjoy the global travels of our peripatetic poley. I like to think of him as the people’s poley. UPDATE. The NYT’s Andrew Rivkin:
We also remember the NYT’s polar bear problems. They went on for quite some time. |
Sunday, May 16, 2010
Now a new bear sub-species - Ursus bogus maximus
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment