This is not the first time that the EPA in the United States has been caught manufacturing results according to predetermined outcomes.
As politically incorrect as it is to say, they did this in relation to secondhand tobacco smoke and again by simply choosing to ignore evidence that conflicted with what it wanted to find.
Examiner.com's Thomas Fuller describes himself as a "liberal Democrat who happens to lean towards the skeptic arguments regarding AGW."
And he was certainly initially sceptical about the claims made by the EPA insider.
The series of emails between him and the insider are discussed at Watts Up With That?
His article is The EPA's internal nightmare over global warming: Part 1
Hmmm, part 1? Sounds like there is more sceptical goodness to come. Can't wait.