Wednesday, August 18, 2010

The chocolate merrygoround again: Good for you. Bad for you and so on ad infinitem.

The Health & Food Skeptic comments:

The finding makes no sense. Why do small variations in the amount eaten make a big difference? The finding looks like data dredging. They just picked out of a whole lot of data one small bit that tended to justify their nine years of work.
Article at the web site.

Posted via email from Garth's posterous

No comments: